The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The line graph compares four types of meat (Chicken,Beef,Lamb,Fish) consumed by per person in European Country between the years of 1979 to 2004.

In general, it can be clearly seen that there is an upward trend of most consuming meat is Chicken, having a highest ratio of consumed meat about 250 grams per individual person per week. Beef meat has a second larger consumption in the earlier year 1979 along with the ratio of 225 grams per person throughout the week. Furthermore it can also be clearly seen that there is downward trend of Beef ,Lamb,Fish among the period of 1979 to 2004.

In fact, an average individual person consumed approximately 150 grams to 210 grams during the period ,after there is a sudden decrease of the consumption beef and lamb by 100 grams until 2004.

On the flip side, the amount of fish remained relatively stable between 1979 to 2004.The figure started around 65 grams and reached at the lowest level just under 50 grams per person per week. In 2004 making fish the least kind of meat consumed by people in European Country.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Beef
...raph compares four types of meat Chicken,Beef,Lamb,Fish consumed by per person in Eur...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Fish
...res four types of meat Chicken,Beef,Lamb,Fish consumed by per person in European Coun...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... most consuming meat is Chicken, having a highest ratio of consumed meat about 25...
^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...5 grams per person throughout the week. Furthermore it can also be clearly seen that there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...een that there is downward trend of Beef ,Lamb,Fish among the period of 1979 to 20...
^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Fish
...at there is downward trend of Beef ,Lamb,Fish among the period of 1979 to 2004. In...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...150 grams to 210 grams during the period ,after there is a sudden decrease of the ...
^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... relatively stable between 1979 to 2004.The figure started around 65 grams and reac...
^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consumed by people in European Country.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, second, so, in fact, in general, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78918918919 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64658496549 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3155730686 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192514994945 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118830463533 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842126055727 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140230269768 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695844478925 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.