The line graph depicts the information about the consuming of fish and three various types of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
The period between 1979 and 1989 experienced the figure fluctuated sightly and dropped to a low of 160 grams, whereas in 1994 to 2004 experienced a sharp decline in the consumption of beef. With regards to chicken, it began at. Around 150 grams in 1979 then peaked at 220 grams in 2004.
Moving further, initiating lamb at 150 grams consumed in by European in 1979 and decreasing to 50 grams in the last year, while the number of grams of fish inclined in first year and decrease dramatically in the last year.
Overall, the highest consumption of the chicken in the all years, whereas fish fall down in over the period given. At the start of the period , Beef was the most popular spread, which was replaced by chicken from 1989 to 1994.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day on one year 87
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012. 78
- The bar graph indicates sales figures for reading materials from 2002 to 2012.Write a report to a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Write at least 150 words 61
- The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...period given. At the start of the period , Beef was the most popular spread, which...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62025316456 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4336615939 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2342441209 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205441943818 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938693361183 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661624873101 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129451003072 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718420689063 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.