The line graph demonstrates the amount of 4 different types of meat that was taken by a particular European country's people the year between 1979 to 2004.
Overall, what stands from the graph is that the quantity of taking chicken was grown over the period, whereas beef and lamb similarly slipped down from the earlier amount. In addition, the line for fishes gradually went down but not as much as beef and lamb.
Though in 1979, the chicken had less amount than lamb which was below 150 grams, thereafter opposite trend was observed for these two features. The chicken creeping from around 148 to 250 grams in 2004, while lamb climbed down close to 50 grams. Although, the fluctuation happened all around the period.
Looking at the beef, in the beginning, it started to go down from 220 grams but after some time it rapidly increased a lot, the just before 1989, it began to decreased and end with just over 100 grams. On the other hand, the amount of taking fish downgraded from 55 to 50 grams.
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le lamb climbed down close to 50 grams. Although, the fluctuation happened all around th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66853932584 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25692414642 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64606741573 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6495999459 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115041939905 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538856036306 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752544004429 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090439544095 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924528802685 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.