The line graph illustrates the amount of fish and three different kinds of meat consumed in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the consumption of fish and meat declined and fish had the lowest amount of consumption among four types of foods.
In 1979, the amount of beef eaten per week was highest, at about 220 grams per person. These figures for chicken and lamb were lower, at around 150 grams per person per week. Each European citizen only consumed nearly 60 grams fish per week which was the lowest figure.
After 15 years, the consumption of fish remained stable, at around 50 gram per capita per week and this figure was still the lowest. Whereas, beef and lamb saw a dramatic decrease in the amount of consumption and these figures ended at about 120 and 70 grams per person per week respectively. In contrast, there was a sharp increase in the amount of eaten chicken which reach a peak of around 250 grams per capita per week in 2004.
- The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? . 61
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 56
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Australia between 1995 anhd 2000 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...n of fish remained stable, at around 50 gram per capita per week and this figure was...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5988372093 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26259918165 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505813953488 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9045051145 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164097324319 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101254764511 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120334375568 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170131203949 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136826043006 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.