The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph demonstrates the amout of fish and tree different kinds of meat consummed by Europeans from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is evident that the consumption of red meat like beef and lamb decreased while the consumption of chicken increased over the period of time. The amount of fish consummed in the country was lowest and remained steadily.
At the beginning of period, the beef was the food that was consummed highest, at more than 200 grams per person a week while the amount of lamb consummed was only 150grams per person per week. After 35 - year period, the consumption of both declined but the consumption of beef was still higher than the lamb, 100 grams per person a week compared with 60 grams per person a week, respectively.
During 35 years, the consumtion of chicken increased noticebly. From about less than 150 gram per person a week in 1979, the amount of chicken consummed in 2009 grew up to around 250 grams per person a week in 2009. The consumption of fish during these years did not fluctuated. It still stayed around 50 grams per person a week through 35 - year period.
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend, do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegestables, sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features amd make comparisons where relevant 86
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 38
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent kinds of meat consummed by Europeans from 1979 to 2004. Overall, it is evide...
^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nsumption of chicken increased over the period of time. The amount of fish consummed in the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...sed noticebly. From about less than 150 gram per person a week in 1979, the amount o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'fluctuate'
Suggestion: fluctuate
...tion of fish during these years did not fluctuated. It still stayed around 50 grams per pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5246957212 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6808821543 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146263483631 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889983702437 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120004223869 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156985228491 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150205062754 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.