The line graph illustrates the consumption of meat and fish products like chicken, beef, lamb and fish from the year 1979 to 2004 in European countries. The trend in consumption of beef, lamb and fish is similar in case of declining stage. And the consumption of chicken has rocketed with in the 35 years of period.
It is apparent that chicken is most consumed meat product in 2004 which has significantly raised from1979 to 2004 (about 140grams to 250grams). And fish is least consumed in Europe from year 1979 to 2004 which has steadily fell from about 60 grams to 50 grams.
The consumption of beef and lamb have fell significantly during the 35 years of period. Beef was most consumed meat product during the year 1979 which was consumed about 215 grams per person. But it is declined by about 185 grams in year 2004. Similarly, lamb was second highest consumed meat in 1979 which fell significantly to the year 2004.
In conclusion, chicken consumption increased in European countries which increased significantly while meat of beef and lamb fell drastically. It shows chicken is most preferred meat item in Europe. Where as, fish is least preferred in Europe which has decline steadily from year 1979 to 2004.
- Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection, while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USAsince 1980 with projections until 2030 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize thee information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- should woman be reponsible for children misbehavior 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 200, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
... is most preferred meat item in Europe. Where as, fish is least preferred in Europe whic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, similarly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89903846154 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65220388846 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399038461538 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4469350211 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9166666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184201675156 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877023652635 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513302192022 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138784455703 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474501790547 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.