The given linear graph reveals the information of fish and other three kinds of meat (lamb, chicken and beef was consumed by European from year 1979 to 2004. The data is calibrated in grams. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it had been shown that; fish was being less consumed by European, while, chicken was not popular but, in 2007 it was the first priority of people, but beef show opposite trend to chicken.
It can be seen that, fish was being less consumed by European from year 1979 to 2007 respectively. In addition to this; both lamb and chicken in 1979 show equal proportion approximately 150 grams per person per week, but; gradually trend was increased in case of chicken up to 250 grams per person per week. However, sharply decreasing trend had been seen in lamb which was below 100 grams per person per week.
Moving further, in year 1979 beef was being consumed by European at high rate ranges from above 200 grams per person per week but less than 250 grams per person per week. Surprisingly, in 1989 both chicken and beef were highly consumed by European. After that, various fluctuations were being observed in graph and at last; in year 2007 trend was seen to be decreased with approximately 130 grams per person per week.
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind , such as reading and doing word puzzles. Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- The first chart show how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart show how green house gas emission takes place summarize the information and give main relevant point and make comparison where relevant. 78
- It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion. Overall, it had been shown that; fish was being less consumed by European...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... respectively. In addition to this; both lamb and chicken in 1979 show equal prop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74208144796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44713981499 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488687782805 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4242500988 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927670616737 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458605414353 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624844869126 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082292787691 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064142674038 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.