The chart demonstrates the amount of fish and 3 different kinds of meat consumed in an European Country over the course of 25 years strating from 1979.
Looking at the chart, it is immediately obvious that the consumption of chicken has a gradually increase where as the popularity of these other food has decreased over the period.
The biggest consumption in 1979 was beef, with about 220 grams eaten per person weekly, where as the lowest consumption in 1979 was fish, at around 60 grams was consumed per week by a person. Lambs and chicken were used in nearly similar amount at 150 grams. However, during the period, the consumption of beef and lamb experienced a dramatical fall to approximately 110 grams and 70 grams respectively. The amount of fish consumed also decreased but very slightly, by 10 grams.
On the other hand, the amount of eaten chicken had a considerable rise. By 2004, it skyrocketed to 240 grams eaten per individual per week making chicken the most preferred kind of meat consumed by people in that country.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d 3 different kinds of meat consumed in an European Country over the course of 25 ...
^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ous that the consumption of chicken has a gradually increase where as the popularity of these other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ion of chicken has a gradually increase where as the popularity of these other food has ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...bout 220 grams eaten per person weekly, where as the lowest consumption in 1979 was fish...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f beef and lamb experienced a dramatical fall to approximately 110 grams and 70 g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87078651685 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7397592545 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2195669188 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161342661786 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655557181856 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646400046649 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106017986581 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585708598022 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.