The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph provides information about how much meat and fish was weekly consumed by per person in a European country, over the period of 25 years.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was a considerable upward trend in the consumption of chicken, while that of beef and lamb saw a considerable fall over in the given period. Another interesting point is that in the first decade, the most popular meat was beef, which was, then, replaced by chicken. In addition, the quantity of fish used was the least, by comparison with the others, over the whole period.
Looking at the details, the figure for beef stood at 220 grams in 1979. In the following 5 years, it increased to 240 while the indicators of lamb decreased from 150 to 100. From 1984 to 1989, there was no significant change in the quantity of beef. The indicators of lamb then continued to fall down with fluctuation and stood at 60 at the end of the period, in 2004. If we look at the consumption of beef, trend was similar. The figure for chicken increased from 150 in 1979 to 250 in 2004, whereas the quantity of fish consumed dipped from 50 to 49.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. What do you think is the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- In some countries young people are not only richer but also safer and healthier than ever before However they are less happy What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2015, and future projections for 2005 61
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted on the media Do you agree or disagree with this statement Your essay should be about 250 words 67
- Studies have suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons and effects of this trend? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51690821256 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48429452629 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3895819201 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124332262268 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497571229185 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403113482087 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952494469208 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300276692839 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.