The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The given line graph gives information about the weekly consumption of fish and meat in a nation in Europe over a period of 25 years starting from 1979 to 2004.

Overall, as can be seen from the line graph, while an upward trend was seen in the quantity of chicken consumed, the opposite was true for the figure for beef, lamb, and fish. In addition, fish was the food that was eaten least weekly over the given period.

In 1979, the amount of beef consumed per week was the highest, at roughly 220 grams, while the figure for fish was significantly lower, at about 65 grams. At the same time, 150 grams and 140 grams of lamb and chicken were eaten weekly by the Euporean population respectively.

In 2004, the amount of chicken consumed weekly in this European nation rose dramatically by 100 grams to approximately 240 grams and became the highest figure in the chart. Additionally, there was a significant decline to about 110 grams in the figure for beef, while the quantity of fish eaten per week fell slightly to only 40 grams. Meanwhile, the lamb’s figure witnessed a gradual drop to about 60 grams.

Overall, as can be seen from the line graph, while an upward trend was seen in the quantity of chicken consumed, the opposite was true for the figure for beef, lamb, and fish. In addition, fish was the food that was eaten least weekly over the given period.

In 1979, the amount of beef consumed per week was the highest, at roughly 220 grams, while the figure for fish was significantly lower, at about 65 grams. At the same time, 150 grams and 140 grams of lamb and chicken were eaten weekly by the Euporean population respectively.

In 2004, the amount of chicken consumed weekly in this European nation rose dramatically by 100 grams to approximately 240 grams and became the highest figure in the chart. Additionally, there was a significant decline to about 110 grams in the figure for beef, while the quantity of fish eaten per week fell slightly to only 40 grams. Meanwhile, the lamb’s figure witnessed a gradual drop to about 60 grams.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 67 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 965.302439024 181% => OK
No of words: 364.0 196.424390244 185% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79945054945 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48202540817 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.288461538462 0.547539520022 53% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 283.868780488 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 1.07073170732 747% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6944727606 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.466666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.46666666667 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993902059244 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048272996005 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545161477789 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781036326542 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063425556007 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.26 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.