The line graph depicts the information about the fish and various types of meat namely chicken, beef and lamb consumed by European people per week from 1974 to 2004.
At a cursory glance at the graph, it is clear that European people ate chicken more than other types of meat and fish was least consumed. The consumption of chicken intially stood at 150 grams per person per week in 1974. After that, people started consuming more chicken and it reached its peak postion at 250 grams per person per week by the end of the year 2004. In contrast, european people in the year 1974 ate beef and lamb 210 and 150 grams per person per week respectively. The consumption of both kinds of meat fell gradually and was noticed approximately 110 and 60 grams per person per week by the year 2004.
On the other hand, european people consumed little amount of fish which was only 60 grams per person per week in the 1974 and its usage decreased slowly and it was noticed 50 grams in the year 2004 with minor fluctuations in the given time period.
Overall, the Europeans consumed meat more than the fish.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 67
- the graph below shows the quantity of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59090909091 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25572201478 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469696969697 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4554428941 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157291451558 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994876873804 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603574628576 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135389663947 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458489197144 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.