The graph below shows the daily consumption of three spreads per person from 1981 to 2007 in a country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the levels of spread consumption over the period of twenty-six years, starting from 1981, concretely via three commodity categories, namely margarine, low fat, and reduced spreads and butter.
It is clear that the number of people consuming different types of spreads drastically fluctuated over the years shown. More specifically, while the figure for margarine consumption stood at a quite stable level, the value for low-fat use significantly increased, and the figure for butter consumption continuously declined.
In 1981, the proportion of butter consumed in grams registered the highest statistic, while the figure for margarine fell to approximately one-third of that amount. At the same time, seemingly, there were no consumers who had a liking for low-fat nourishment or were willing to reduce spreads in their daily meals. Notwithstanding in 1996, in the food consumption market, there was a sudden sharp rise in the demand for low-fat and reduced-fat spreads. The number of people who would like to decrease the fat content in their diet kept sharply rising until 2001 when it peaked at respectively 82 grams. Conversely, the amount of butter and margarine consumed both experienced a downward trend.
By 2007, the figure for margarine consumption had fallen to 40 grams, and the number of people consuming butter had been only one-third of that in 1996. Also in 2007, the number of low-fat products recorded the highest consumption, while this figure in 1996 was almost zero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umed both experienced a downward trend. By 2007, the figure for margarine consum...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3625 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9103234595 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579166666667 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4857506432 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.7 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938066845667 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404812418959 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437084171368 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075071361442 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509964519605 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.