The given line graph illustrates the amount of food consumed in Australia within 40 years, from 1950 to 2010.
Overall, the number of vegetables eaten per person per year in Australia was by far the highest throughout the research. Moreover, almost types of food in Australia witnessed an increase in consumption except for meat.
In 1950, Australians ate vegetables the most, at above 140 kilograms per person per year, while the figures for bread were significantly lower, at 40 kilograms. Besides, the number of fruits consumed in Australia was slightly lower than meat, at 80 kilograms. By contrast, only 20 kilograms of seafood using by people in Australia.
In 2010, there was a gradual increase of about 20 kilograms to 140 kilograms in the figures for vegetables. At the same time, the amount of bread used here saw a significant increase from 20 kilograms to 60 kilograms. Especially, whereas seafood experienced a slight rise in total consumption of about 3 kilograms to 22 kilograms, only meat witnessed a decline by about 30 kilograms to 80 kilograms.
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 40
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 84
- The process below shows the Human Resources HR recruitment process for a company Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9473196168 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7260651496 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102304347109 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532289830657 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543071650795 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874345176635 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604155014785 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.