The line graph illustrates the percentage of people who have gone through adolescence usually do in their free time in United States from 1980 to 2010.
What stands out from the graph is that almost the trends of things that people spend time on increases in the early years except for going to the theatre. Until the last year, hiking is the thing that took the highest position compared to the rest of the things.
Looking at the graph for more details, it can be seen that the rates of older adults who watch tv in their free time peaked at 60% in the 1980s, then it continued to rise to 70% over the next 20 year. However, the number of people watching TV dropped slightly to about 65% in 2010s. There was a grow considerable to more than 10% in the number of adults surfing the Internet in the 20 years first, which was followed by a huge upsurge to 50% in 2010s. In addition, a rapid bounce from 20% to the highest point was witnessed in the ratio of people who usually go hiking between 1980s and 2010s.
Besides, starting at 30% in 1980s, the proportion of older adults who often reading in their free time leaped moderately to 40% after 10 years. Over the next 10 years, the number of people reading books plummeted noticeably by 20%, but later this figure jumped enormously to 60% in the last year. The rate of people who usually go to the theatre experienced a marked plunge to 30% in the year 1990s. Nevertheless, the number of people going to the theatre is increasing, so this rate has taken off significantly to more than 40% until the last year.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...tching TV dropped slightly to about 65% in 2010s. There was a grow considerable to more ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ightly to about 65% in 2010s. There was a grow considerable to more than 10% in the nu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...h was followed by a huge upsurge to 50% in 2010s. In addition, a rapid bounce from 20% t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... and 2010s. Besides, starting at 30% in 1980s, the proportion of older adults who oft...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45833333333 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30927316992 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5424415643 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.727272727 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140267437011 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586450496225 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063285998475 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107916612947 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706435958356 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.