The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrate how many of people went abroad for traveling in 4 distinct years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 in 4 different areas.
What stands out from the table is that while the number of tourists to Africa, Europe , Asia and Pacific, Middle West and in total in global travel witnessed a progress. The opposite trend was true for those t America. Besides, the nuber of people travelling to Middle West were always the lowest.
Starting the highest point in 1990 with 680,5 million people moving to America and after some rises and falls, those figures went down drammatically around one-sixth at 113,2 million in 2005. Besides, the number of people choose Erope as a tourist destination has surged sharply from the second point with 280,2 t the highest position in 4 distinct years.
Finally, all 3 remaining area have a relatively increasing trend of the changes f people who went for international travel over time. The figures in A, A n P witnessed an increase from 18,2 to 28,7 miliion and from 60,2 to 113,2 million respectively. This figures to MW were aways the lowest but still witnessed a rise by 6 million over 4 years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. Exeriencing the similar trend was the total number of people went abroad for traveling of 4 different areas which witnessed a rise from 448,9 to 693,7 million during a decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 84
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 73
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 84
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the number of tourists to Africa, Europe , Asia and Pacific, Middle West and in to...
^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...and in total in global travel witnessed a progress. The opposite trend was true for those ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of people choose Erope as a tourist destination has surged sharply from the ...
^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...nal travel over time. The figures in A, A n P witnessed an increase from 18,2 to ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78787878788 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52524412825 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6390665939 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272109433146 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112601359639 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830723289656 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178511194885 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833110658811 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.