The graph below shows how much time schoolchildren aged 10-11 years old spend per week for different home activities.
The given line graph provides information relating to the number of hours spent for TV and computer usage by 10-11 years old pupils on a weekly basis from 2000 till present.
According to the illustrated data, the time used in a week for computer games by schoolers aged 10 and 11, experienced gradual increase, while the figures of television fluctuated over a given period covered by the graph.
Coming to the trend for the children's time spending weekly on PC, we can see that it showed only an upward trend starting from 3 hours in 2000, reaching 22 hours by the current period.
Looking at the details of consumed time by mentioned schoolchildren on Tv-set, it is clear that the period started with static pattern. Afterwards, rates leveled off from 21 to 15 hours in 2004. Before the variation between 2005 and 2006, the figures had been stable for a year. For the rest of the time the numbers remained constant again at 15 hours.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped and taught separately. 73
- The graph below gives information about the hours spent weekly on home activities by schoolchildren aged 10-11. 56
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past. Some people argue that this is because competition for job is greater that it used to be. Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to 73
- The graph below shows how much time schoolchildren aged 10-11 years old spend per week for different home activities. 89
Comments
I am satisfied with the score
I am satisfied with the score.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71515151515 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50936903743 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1521579083 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265384983445 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10448763989 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666248651685 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154752414373 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415854220823 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.