The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares health-care systems of three European nations, namely Austria, France and Sweden in a 20-year period
Overall, there were noticeable changes in each category over the course of 2 decades. However, the Sweden system appeared to have remained as the finest
With regards to the physicians, in all years, Sweenden had the most of them with 3.6 physicians per 1000 individuals in 1980, which rised to 3.8 in 2000. Austria and France saw an opposite trend in this when the number of physicians in austria steadily increase from 0.8 to 1, the figure for france was witnessed with a 1.1 decrease. Moreover, Sweeden also had a remarkable number of beds in hospitals with 6.4 of them per 1000 people, which was higher than that of France 32 times.
There were all growths in the number of hospital beds in Austria, France and Sweden with the inceases of 2.3, 1.4 and 0.5 respectively. Moreover, it is apparent that the hospital quality of France was not really high when the number of days people staying in these hospitals declined significantly throughout 20 years, from 9 to 5 days. In contrast, the figure for Austria although was seen with a plummet in 1990, it still remained unchanged at the end
- The diagram below shows the stages and equiment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 61
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 77
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Austria although was seen with a plummet in 1990, it still remained unchanged at ...
^^
Line 4, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., it still remained unchanged at the end
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82775119617 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58883953802 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583732057416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5658477885 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.142857143 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0245691918147 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0119404481986 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.018891897348 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0191266314991 0.15604864568 12% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225692096227 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.