The bar chart illustrates changes in male and female employment rate across 5 European countries and the USA in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, the rate increased stably regardless of gender. However, the male employment rate was always higher than the female rate in both Australia, Switzerland, Iceland, the UK, New Zealand, and the USA.
In 1995, the proportion of men who got occupations was over 55%, 65% and 70% in Australia, Switzerland, and Iceland respectively. In the next decade, the figure rose to nearly 70%, 78% and 82% accordingly. In terms of female employment rate, Australia, Switzerland, and Iceland in turn witnessed a steady increase from 27% to under 40%, from 56% to 69%, and from over 40% to 51%. Therefore, it is clear that although the female figure surged significantly, the male employment rate was higher throughout the whole period.
In the UK, New Zealand, and the USA, in 1995, about 50%, 23%, and 45% females have jobs. Ten years later, the rate surged to about 62%, 41%, and over 60% respectively. The male's figure started with 55%, 60% and under 60% in 1995 and jumped to 71%, over 70% and 70% respectively in 2005.
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 84
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You shoul 61
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children while other think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- In school and universities girls tend to choose art while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to nearly 70%, 78% and 82% accordingly. In terms of female employment rate, Austra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88265306122 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74303384847 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4018361106 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213267156875 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907668672251 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898191384213 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1679430938 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103232004815 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.