The graphs illustrates flows of international migration in United of Kingdom during a long period from 1999 to 2008.
Over one decade, the amount of people who immigrates into British exceeds that of residents leaving UK every year. Both statistic figures witnessed a steady rise within 10 years. As a result, the net number are positive all the time.
To be precise, nearly 300 thousand individuals decided to leave for another country while approximately 450 thousand ones became British residents in 1999. The two numbers reach respectively over 400 thousand and 600 thousand in 2008. It’s noticeable that the trend of emigration reach a stable phase after 2004 and people choose to emigrate declined in 2007 but bounded up in 2008.
The net increase of new British citizen remained nearly unchanged in the period of 1999 and 2003. In 2004 which was a peak year, the total British members rises 200 thousand people.
- Some people say that the government should pay for health care and education of its citizens Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion 74
- The map shows the development of the Chorleywood village. 61
- UK telephone calls, by category, 1995-2002. 78
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. DO you think it is positive or negative development? 56
- Some people believe that anyone can create art such as painting, poetry, music and so on. Others think that a person should have special abilities to create art. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The graphs illustrates flows of international migration in Uni...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly over 400 thousand and 600 thousand in 2008. It's noticeable that the tren...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60585210741 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686274509804 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9709389237 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8888888889 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103897887767 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425425546444 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685406528734 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801436648953 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882888985574 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.