The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014
The given line graph reveals the comparison of two genders in reading books in Burnaby Public Library between 2011 and 2014. Units are measured in numbers. Overall, the male readers showed a steady rise initially, but there was a slight decrease at the end, while the number of females’ experienced a upward trend over the given period.
In 2005 the number of books read by men was the lowest with 3.000, meantime, women accounted for 2.000 more than men did (5.000). Following that, male readers’ share minimally expanded from 2011 to 2012 and also female substituted the similar trend in the same year (from 3.000 to 4.000 and from 5.000 to 8.000 respectively).
There was a considerable escalate on men’s data in 2013 which was higher than previous year with 7.000 of gap (3.000 and 10.000 accordingly). In 2014 this figure notably increased accounting for almost 15.000 with the highest quantity in compare to women over the whole period. Inspite of the moderate grew up to 2013 year in female data, this trend dramatically plunged in 2014(10.000 and 8.000 relatively).
- The graph below gives information about international tourist inbounds in five countries from 1995 to 2010. 78
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 11
- About Nuclear powerOpinion essay 78
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 78
- Advances in science and technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die There is no better time to be alive than now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinio 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the number of females' experienced a upward trend over the given period. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03888888889 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63206134305 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1684150147 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225705943857 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101878301815 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11411954958 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167229594098 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10426692805 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.