The graph below shows the number of enquiries to tourist information office made by telephone, letter/email, and in person from January 2001 to June 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r

The figure elucidates the enquiry's number of holidaymakers information office made by telephone, letter or email and in person between January 2001 and June 2001. At first glance, it is evident that the most enormous enquiries was coming from in person aspect.

To begin with, it is able to be seen that in person and by telephone aspect have the same pattern over the following 6 months. In January 2001, in person enquiry stood at 400 questions and unexpectedly, it increased dramatically in the next 6 months to achieve at 1200 questions. In addition to by telephone aspect, January 2001 to April 2001 witnessed a gradual trend in the number of enquiry, which made up at the same score as January, approximately at 800, and erratically it uplifted significantly over the following 2 months to end at well beneath 1200.

In contrast, there was a tremendous drop in the number of enquiry in letter or email aspect. In January 2001, it upright positioned at 600 enquiries, at the first two months it solely saw a moderate decline, nevertheless, in the next 3 months afterwards, it plunged highly to achieve at 200 enquiries.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... months to end at well beneath 1200. In contrast, there was a tremendous drop i...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r of enquiry in letter or email aspect. In January 2001, it upright positioned at ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.890625 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92138290568 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2718932134 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260021668913 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147809558231 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150869264487 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21911296065 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143076674474 0.0819641961636 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.