The graph below shows the number of enquiries to tourist information office made by telephone, letter/email, and in person from January 2001 to June 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart depicts the number of inquiries made to the tourist information office through various means of communication, between January and June 2001.
Overall, personal and telephonic enquiries showed an upward tendency, while inquiries by email and letter had faced the worst period.
Telephonic enquiries started at 800 in January and stabilized at this number till April 2001. After which experienced a steady growth and ended at around 1100 in June 2001. However, personal inquiries stood at the bottom point, 400 in January. Interestingly, the number of individual inquiries rocketed at just above 800 in March and surpassed information by telephone. Again, The figure increased rapidly, constituted 1200, after showing a steady period between March and April 2001.
The trend for inquiries by emails and letters stood at 600 in January. Inquiry office had approximately 400 inquiries in May 2001. In following month, this number is plummeted and accounted for only 200 in June 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-10 | Truong Y Nhi | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | wowowowowow | view | |
| 2019-04-29 | alifdores | 84 | view |
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The gap between rich and poor is growing What problems does this create What can be done to tackle them 84
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbles and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this Information may be relevant and useful Others disagree Discuss both these views 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43949044586 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76960956627 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5925624159 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285225298069 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113439028648 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616990544822 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183073571807 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556993862041 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.