The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010.
The given line chart illustrates the figure for global conferences measured in 3 different cities during the period 1980 to 2010.
It is clear that there was an opposite trend in the number of international conferences in 3 city centers from 1980 to 2010. The increase in worldwide conferences from city C was particularly significant, while city A and B decline slightly.
According to the information in 1980, the number of global meetings in city A was 35 conferences compared to around 30 conferences and no conference in city C. In 1985, City A showed a remarkable decrease to figure for 20 conferences which were nearly twice as high as that for city C. During the next 10 years, there was a significant rise to 30 conferences from city A which was not far behind the data of international conferences in city B in1990.
In 2005, both city A, B and C had a fairly equal proportion of global conferences which accounted for approximately 25 conferences. In the end year of the period, the number of worldwide conferences changed position in relation to each city as city C accounted for over 30 conferences, followed by roughly 15 conferences in city A and 25 conferences in city B.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-20 | Tran Ngoc Anh | 46 | view |
| 2018-09-20 | Tran Ngoc Anh | 81 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010 81
- The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010 46
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant rise to 30 conferences from city A which was not far behind the data of i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78260869565 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15562862493 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6761805855 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344190063887 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190746235828 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714837170684 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237855654366 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048742311271 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.