The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying at IT university from 1985-2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying at IT university from 1985-2015.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides some information about the amount of male and female students studying at university from 1985-2015, and the overall shows over this 35 years period.

According to the graph, there didn't study any female students in the 1985, it is so bad that didn't have opportunity for female. However amount of male students was 5000. Then after 5 years statistics of female students a bit changed, add 3000 students, it is great that women started to study. In the 2000 amount of male and female students was tha same, it was about 18000, these statistics were gradually increasing until 2010. But unfortunately in this year women students slumped over from 32000 to 29000, while amount of men students kept increasing. In the end in 2015 the number of male students was higher than female students, it's 40000 of male students and 29000 of female students and it is great that lots of student started to learn.

In conclusion, male students were always more than female students, these statistics were gradually increasing from 1985 to 2015, while female students dropped in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-18 Alibek5327 78 view
2019-12-18 Alibek5327 73 view
2019-12-17 Alibek5327 73 view
2019-12-17 Alibek6464 61 view
2019-12-17 Alibek6464 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... According to the graph, there didnt study any female students in the 1985, ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...students in the 1985, it is so bad that didnt have opportunity for female. However am...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...that didnt have opportunity for female. However amount of male students was 5000. Then ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 714, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun student seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of students'.
Suggestion: lots of students
...of female students and it is great that lots of student started to learn. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02173913043 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46820519042 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8682574873 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310602307051 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15373460749 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940874247698 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256725106693 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710543315281 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.