The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.

The line graph compared the distinct places of a nation in Europe in terms of the number of international guests from 1987 to 2007.

Overal, there was an increasing trend in the number of abroad travelers to these places and both of the coast and the lake the mountain were more popular destination for overseas tourist than Series 3.
Having 40 thousand overseas tourists in 1987, the coast was the most visited places compared to the lake the mountain and series three which had 10 thousand visitors and 20 thousand ones respectively. In the next decade, the number of foreign travelers to the lake and the mountain increased gradually prior to dramatically growing to reach the highest position at about 75 thousand visitors in 2002. Meanwhile, there was a slight decrease in the number of overseas tourists to the coast in 1992 and it climbed progressively to approximately 62 thousand visitors in 2002. In contrast, it witnessed a fluctuation between 20000 visitor and 30000 visitors in the number of people visiting Series 3 before reaching at the point of 25000 people.

In the remainder of the period, in comparison to the number of abroad tourists to the lake and the mountain, which reduced moderately and reached the final point at 65000 visitors in 2007, that to Series 3 had the opposite trend. It went up slightly and ended at the number of 35000 visitors. In contrast, after mildly uplifting to 70000 visitors, the figure for people travelling to the coast dropped noticeably by 15000 visitors at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 626, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'visitor' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'visitors'.
Suggestion: visitors
...t witnessed a fluctuation between 20000 visitor and 30000 visitors in the number of peo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as to, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91570881226 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69067559864 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4465709242 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.555555556 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202915474209 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920691576056 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419499220132 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124045216307 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492358683113 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.