The line graph illustrates the quantity of foreigners visiting to 3 different natural landscapes in a specific European from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, it can be clearly seen form the graph that the number of overseas travelers to the coast, the mountain and the lakes surged considerably during the years shown. In addtion, the people who visited the coast was higher than those of the two others.
In 1987 ,the number of foreign people to the coast was the highest with about 40TH.This number doubled the numbers of visitors coming to visit the mountain and four times higher than that of the lakes visitors with 20TH and 10TH respectively. From 1987 to 1992, the visitors to the coast decreased gradually while the figure for the lakes increased slightly. Likewise, the mountains witnessed a slight increase before a sank to the same number as the lake's.
The percentage of visitors to the coast kept on increasing until it reached the peak in 2007. The proportion of people who visited the mountain went through an erratic period; however it still had the lowest number of passengers compared to the other two.
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 56
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... than those of the two others. In 1987 ,the number of foreign people to the coas...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...e coast was the highest with about 40TH.This number doubled the numbers of visitors ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the mountain and four times higher than that of the lakes visitors with 20TH and...
^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before a sank to the same number as the lakes. The percentage of visitors to t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91005291005 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5173399937 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2428611577 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216585110963 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916891803658 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065634781749 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134598774519 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578955101095 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.