The designated line graph depicts that numerous foreign tourists (in millions) visited United Kingdom on various grounds between a time period of 1989 and 2009.
Overall, While the visit for vacation remained questionable throughout the time period, there was a moderate lift for those who visited for business or meeting their loved ones but a downfall in the end. Mostly, vacationers were higher than the other two.
Turning to details, 6. 5 million explorers visited UK for holidaying in 1989 which kept rising and touched the highest, 9 million, in 1997. Following that, it witnessed drastic downfall reaching 6. 5 million by 2004. Finally, the figures resurrected to 9 million in 2009.
Probing further, the ones toured for business or meeting relatives began with 5 and almost 3. 5 million respectively in 1989. Both rose slowly hitting their peaks in 2009, the former at 8 and latter at 7 million followed by a slight downward trend settling at 7 and 6 million respectively. There was a small dip for business purpose near 1992 attributing to 4 million. However, at times the figures were clashing amongst different visits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08556149733 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70858650362 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673796791444 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.116004109 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1538461538 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3846153846 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122230058787 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410249151605 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349827644618 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789155197262 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154195499038 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.