The line graph illustrates how many people spent their vacations in the Caribbean island over the course of 7 years from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, an upward trend was witnessed in the number of visitors who came to the island in total, while the proportion of clients staying on cruise ships as well as on-island fluctuated during the given period. Another interesting point is that the per cent of visitors staying on the island was not as high as that of people breaking on the island.
Looking at the graph for more details, it is obvious that the percentage of costumers staying on the ship and in total experienced a rapid rise in the year from 2010. Meanwhile, the figure for island stayers remained stable status during that time which was 0,75 million people. Two years after that, a relatively similar pattern was observed between 2013 and 2014, but with a roughly twofold number.
From 2015 to 2016, the number of participants in both options seemed to be level off before the steep rise to 3,5 million people in 2017. Over the same period, the number of visitors living on the island decreases sharply and hit the trough at around 1,25 millions clients, then this figure grew again to 2 million. Meanwhile, a reverse pattern can be seen from that of tourists spending their break in cruise ships, which saw a dramatical growth in the last 2 years of the given course.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many schools these days have problems with poor student behavior Why do you think these problems occur What could be done to tackle these problems 73
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media TV newspaper Internet Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances governments 81
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who are able to read and write in the different regions of the world and the world average in 2004 61
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71074380165 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37310995184 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6872587709 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141538853724 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604013056206 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345632390587 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946201561173 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324737014616 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.