The line graph gives data about the quantity of people who visited carribbean island in over seven years periond.
Overall, the aggregate number of tourists visiting increased very noticeably year by year.
More specifically, the numbers of visitors who stayed cruise ships were almost 0,3 million in 2010 while the quantity of people who stayed in the island were around 0,7 million in that year which mentioned abowe. Yet after that year the numbers changed for visitors who lived cruise ships reached 0,5 million and visitors who slept island stayed constand.
However, the quantity of people who rested in island had seen a dramatic growth from 2012 to 2016 and the peak of visitor numbers was 1,5 million . Even though the numbers of visitors who stayed on cruise ships decreased, it began climbing again from 2012. The biggest numbers of tourists who slept on cruise ship reached 2 millions in 2017. Totally, both kind of tourists numbers who slept in island and who stayed cruise ships were 3,5 million in that year mentioned above. The resualts are very high for both categories.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages to this development 56
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 80
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with the statement
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntity of people who stayed in the island were around 0,7 million in that year whi...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich mentioned abowe. Yet after that year the numbers changed for visitors who liv...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached 0,5 million and visitors who slept island stayed constand. However, the...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 2012 to 2016 and the peak of visitor numbers was 1,5 million . Even though th...
^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...peak of visitor numbers was 1,5 million . Even though the numbers of visitors wh...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on . Even though the numbers of visitors who stayed on cruise ships decreased, it...
^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourists who slept on cruise ship reached 2 millions in 2017. Totally, both kind o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02197802198 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26408946551 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4741567349 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113708267669 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643994421093 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346759862715 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874778646026 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154748192317 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.