The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph demonstrate the number of tourists visited Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017. In the year 2010 in totals up 1 million people, visited Caribbean island. There were 250.000 of them thet stayed on cruise ships. And the rest 750.000 were staying on island.

The total number of visitors is increased in the year 2011 and amounted to 1 million and quarter visitors during the year. In that 2011 year the number of visitors which stayed on cruise ships sharply increased and was half million people. However the number of visitors which stayed on cruise ships not changed and amounted to the same statistics as in 2010 and exactly half million.

The total number of tourists which visited Caribbean island increased year by year. In the 2012 year total number amounted to one and half million visitors during the year. Moving on 2013 year the total number of tourists increased to 2 million people. As well as in 2014 year enlarged to two and half million of visitors. During the year 2015 the total number of visitors sharply increased by quarter million tourists. The next 2016 year the total number of tourists not changed. In the final year 2017 the total number of tourists reached his peak and amounted to three and half million visitors.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'demonstrates'.
Suggestion: demonstrates
The graph demonstrate the number of tourists visited Caribbea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... increased and was half million people. However the number of visitors which stayed on ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24746465905 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.37037037037 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3801656202 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5714285714 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78571428571 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155766408226 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934240169948 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115496659393 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143515457316 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952521523795 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.35 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.