The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied line graphs describe the total of students in Canada who have passed their graduate programme. This graphic also differentiate a number of females and males as comparative in 1992 to 2007.
Generally, both of graduate students underwent the increasing trend from 1992 to the last 2006. It also showcased enormous different in the number which the women obviously reached the greater number that men. Besides, the progress is rocketed steadily on the women line while the men only seemed a little growth.
Another comparative between the two is also clear from the immense of proportion. In 1992 as the oldest year, it took almost 100.000 for females graduates whereas males picked the lower number 70.000. Along the year, the change occurred untill the last 2006. Females graduates unexpectedly hit the sharp rate there are approximately 149.000, and in the opposite no more than 100.000 Canada were graduating males students. This number has the equal proportion with the female graduates in 1992.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-27 | thutrang154 | 55 | view |
- The two tables show the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment. 78
- over fishing has become a very common practice in many countries what do you think are the effects of ever fishing use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence 87
- Chevening is looking for individuals who have a clear post-study career plan. Please outline your immediate plans upon returning home and your longer term career goals. You may wish to consider how these relates to what the UK government is doing in your 70
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outwieigh the disadvantages? 78
- In some countries nowadays people prefer variety of foods Which are not grown in their local area So these foods are imported from other regions Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantage 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25153374233 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58323736515 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4226184016 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185730290226 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742311643948 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460240942763 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130155416579 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027407728386 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.