This line graph describes the amount of alumnus in Canada University from 1992 to 2007. This information divides into two categories of gender. Overall, for both genders growth were significantly increased in 2007 and it dominated with females.
In 1992, female graduates counted almost 100.000 people, but conversely, male graduates lowered than females, it was about 70.000 graduates. After 3 years, both genders growth were rising steeply and it counted 77.000 for males and 104.000 for females. From 1996 to 1998, the growth for women and male students who graduates were dramatically decreased and the amounts were similar in 1993. Since 1998, the amount of male alumnus was fluctuating, but the amounts were variety. However, female graduates started to rocket until it reached almost 130.000 graduates in 2004 and reached the maximum number with almost 150.000 in 2007. For male students, the highest amount was 96.000 throughout 15 years.
In summary, both gender amount from 1992 to 2007 were growing, but female graduates were dominating in the past 15 years. I believe in the future the number of female alumnus will increase and it becomes the common gender which graduates from university in Canada.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as posible in scientific research business and the academic world Other believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give y 61
- The two maps below show read access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reorting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The development of tourism contributed to Eanglish becoming the most prominent language in the world Some pople think this will lead to English beloming the only language to be spoken globallt What are the advantages and disadvantage to having one languag 73
- Write about the following topic:Some people think that young people should choose their professions themselves. Others believe that their parents should choose for them.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29381443299 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49289030494 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0057312751 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3636363636 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161754180197 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776219948838 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770866640415 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147300226435 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052930080076 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.