The graph below shows the number of vehicles owned by per thousand people in China from 1987 to 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar chart gives data on how many vehicles are possessed per thousand population by Chinese between over two-yearly intervals between 1987 and 1999. At the first glance, it is clear that the whole period witnessed a significant increase in ownership of means of transportation
In 1987 the number of vehicles in use per thousand people stood at around 300, followed by a twofold rise to reach more or less 500 vehicles by late eighties. The figure continued to go up steadily during the next 4 years which amounted to 1000 vehicles per thousand people
During the second half of nineties, the rate of increase in vehicle ownership skyrocketed. To begin with, around 2000 vehicles were registered by a thousand Chinese individuals in 1995 before jumping up by 50% in 1997 to 3000 vehicles. After that, the number of vehicles per thousand reached a peak of just over 4000 by the end of the given period, over double that of 1995 and 13 times more than 1987’s.
- The graph below shows the number of vehicles owned by per thousand people in China from 1987 to 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The graph below shows the number of vehicles owned by per thousand people in China from 1987 to 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the number of vehicles owned by per thousand people in China from 1987 to 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in ownership of means of transportation In 1987 the number of vehicles in use pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82634730539 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66357374987 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1322877354 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.2 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203901686863 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10869348623 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296053292011 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1416571104 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461650075958 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.