The bar chart shows how many people visited to three museums in New York, Tokyo and China from 2000 to 2005. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the numbers of visitors have increased significantly Edo-Tokyo the first half of the period. Visiting of people to MET has seen a steady rise over the second half of the period.
According to the graph, MET has got 12 million visitors in the initial year. Edo-Tokyo has unchanged in two years, until it has declined to 9 million visitors in 2002. As regards, the trend for national it increased steadily to 2 million guests between 2000 and 2002.
If we look at the three years, it is clear to see that, visiting experienced only positive figures. As for, the figures for MET, they started at 7 million people. The numbers of visiting to Edo-Tokyo museum rose slightly from 2003 to 2005. Visitors of National stabilized at 11 million people till , it peaked at about 16 million visitors in the last year of the period.
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 67
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 40
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nal stabilized at 11 million people till , it peaked at about 16 million visitors ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62643678161 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40831213653 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2129274328 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156825635119 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652884189434 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496284221491 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109606571854 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239867393414 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nal stabilized at 11 million people till , it peaked at about 16 million visitors ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62643678161 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40831213653 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2129274328 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156825635119 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652884189434 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496284221491 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109606571854 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239867393414 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.