The graph below shows the numbers of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011

The line graph demonstrates the number of questions the Tourist Information Office of a city collected through three types ways from January to June in 2011.

In general, the queries asked directly and through telephone were increasingly favored within six month while there was a downward trend in the number of people using letters and emails to ask questions. In addition, the number of inquiries conducted in person starting the lowest number of three reached the highest point in June.

From January to March, a total of enquiries in person rose sharply whereas less and less people used letters and emails. In the middle of February, the number of two types were the same with about 700. The usage of telephone fluctuated and continued ranking first after three months with 1000 questions.

Three months later, the number of face to face inquiries surpassed that of queries raised through calling with 1900 and 1600 respectively. Questions in written forms, on the contrary, hit the lowest of about 400

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...ne were increasingly favored within six month while there was a downward trend in the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...in person rose sharply whereas less and less people used letters and emails. In the ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, whereas, while, in addition, in general, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09580838323 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5001846538 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8677501246 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189303628389 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737991335299 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752380735669 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121246530309 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840013588775 0.0819641961636 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.