the graph below shows the percentage of households not having internet access by reason in great Britain between 2008 and 2014
The chart compares various reasons why households in Great Britain lack internet access between 2008 and 2014.
Overall, it is clear that regarding the two main reasons, not needing the internet and a lack of skills, the trend was upwards throughout the period, while that for the other reasons was fairly flat. For example, approximately one third (about 34%) of households did not need internet access in 2008 compared to more than a half (approximately 54%) in 2014.
By contrast, while there was a rise in the proportion of households without internet access because of lack of skills, from about 15% in 2008 to just over 30% in 2014, the trend in the proportion for high equipment costs was slightly downwards, 10% compared to 13% in 2000 and 2014 respectively. As regards high access cost, the trend was flat
with a peak of about 15% in 2010 from 11% in 2008, but privacy and security was less of a concern with the proportion giving this reason, however, doubling between 2008 and 2014, from approximately 3% to 6%.
- crime in Manchester
- crime in Manchester city center in 2003 to 2012
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- the graph below shows the percentage of households not having internet access by reason in great Britain between 2008 and 2014 73
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, so, third, while, as regards, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77966101695 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60546939072 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9883571974 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.2 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 5.23603664747 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293151579963 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19997720297 0.103423049105 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143544618839 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22795185888 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143784509294 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.