The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph above illustrates the comparison of percentage of people working part-time during the year 1980 and 2010 in four countries of United Kingdom. As seen from the graph, the number of hard-working citizens is more in Wales in both the years. Also, the number of part time workers have kept increasing in England, Scotland and Wales from 1980 to 2010. Whereas, Northern Ireland is the only country where people have opted to not work additionally from their full-time jobs in 2010 compared to 1980.
In the beginning, the highest positive difference of percentage (nearly 9%) between 1980 and 2010 is in Scotland. Following this, the lowest negative difference (around 2%) is noted in Northern Ireland. Furthermore, the percentage of part-time workers in Wales is greater than 30% in both the years. Also, it is less than 20% in Northern Island and Scotland during both years.
Finally, it is noted that the highest percentage of part-time workers is approximately 34% in Wales in year 2010 and lowest percentage of part-time workers is almost 12% in Scotland in year 1980.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-23 hellocacban view
2022-08-05 kaushalpatel569 55 view
2022-06-01 Elena Phan 73 view
2022-02-14 Vuthungan 78 view
2021-11-14 phuongquynh79 47 view
Essays by user Firdouspathan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...es in both the years Also the number of part time workers have kept increasing in England...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs is almost 12 in Scotland in year 1980
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85555555556 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63412435377 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 180.0 22.4926829268 800% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 874.0 112.824112599 775% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 180.0 22.9334400587 785% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 43.0 5.23603664747 821% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224632864838 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224632864838 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156323893861 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722857848813 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 91.5 13.2329268293 691% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -94.3 61.2550243902 -154% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 71.1 10.3012195122 690% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.09 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.46 8.06136585366 192% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 74.0 10.9970731707 673% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 92.0 11.0658536585 831% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.