Human activity has had a negative effect on ecosystems, animals and plants across the world. Some people believe this cannot be changed while others feel that we can still take action to protect living things and the environment.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
Human beings have had a damaging impact on environment around the world. Some people think this cannot be avoided while others are confident that we still can take measures to safeguard these lining things and the nature. In this essay I will discuss both the views shared and give my opinion. Firstly, I will discuss why many of them feel that we cannot make any changes and secondly, I will explore the reasons why we can still do a lot more to protect our ecosystem.
To begin with, we are currently living in the fast-pacing world, where economy is also growing rapidly. Many factories and industries are converting raw material into finished products for sale, which in turn uses more and more natural items like woods, animal skin and animal meat, etc. Thus, many people feel that in order to satisfy the need of blooming economy we will have to continue to harvest the natural resources. Additionally, due to rising population, the needs of our society are continuously increasing and we are utilizing nonrenewable energy at a higher rate than before and ultimately exploiting our ecosystem, animals and plants.
But on the other hand, some people believe we can still take steps at a smaller level just by avoiding the usage of plastic and using a substitute of that like earthen pots or steel utensils. In addition to this, in order to avoid pollution, we can use car pooling as an option and stop using private vehicles for our daily traveling. We can also continuously monitor use of electricity and water while we are away and avoid wastage of the same.
In conclusion, it is difficult to satisfy everyone’s demands while balancing the use of natural resources. But, in my opinion, we still can take initiatives to save our environment and protects living things from harms caused by human activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-21 | Firdouspathan | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-16 | gigigns | 56 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative effect on ecosystems animals and plants across the world Some people believe this cannot be changed while others feel that we can still take action to protect living things and the environment Discuss both sides and give 78
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets Other people prefer to do their food shopping online Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots What is your opinion 56
- You are looking for a full time job Write a letter to an employment agency In your letter introduce yourself explain what sort of job you would like say what experience and skills you have Begin your letter as follows Dear Sir Madam You should write at le 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87419354839 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63467828332 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1197938914 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.230769231 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365888478033 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124884426648 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809245090049 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219147022823 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116144731671 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.