The line graph compares the proportion of people in a particular city who went to music concerts over a 5-year period (2010-2015), split by age.
Overall, the youngest age group overtook those aged 45-54 to become the group with the highest level of music concert attendance, while elderly people’s participation was lowest. In addition, the greatest increase in attendance levels was recorded for the youngest group.
In 2010, just over 50% of people aged 45 to 54 attended music concerts, while the figures for the 16 to 24-year-olds and the 25 to 44-year-olds were lower, at 40% each. One year later, however, the percentage of the youngest group going to music concerts surpassed that of the middle-aged group, increasing steadily to about 70% in 2015. The figures for the 45-54 and 25-44 age groups ended at around 52% and 49%, respectively, in 2015.
Turning to the two remaining groups, the 55-64 age group’s attendance at music concerts declined slightly from about 25% in 2010 to approximately 22% in 2015, while the figure for the elderly who are aged 75 or over rose from 10% to just above 20%, despite some small drops in between.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...24-year-olds and the 25 to 44-year-olds were lower, at 40% each. One year later, how...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9381443299 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67433887643 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.25761024 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285852046211 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148456125623 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663058410774 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192980752056 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414612939349 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.