The line graph illustrates the proportion of concert attendees in terms of five different age groups in a particular city from 2010 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that all six age brackets experienced an upward trend in the number of concert attendees, except for those aged 25-44 and 55-64. In addition, the elderly were least interested in attending live concerts, whereas the youngest group participated most.
Looking at the chart in greater detail, in 2010, the 16-24 and 45-54 age groups accounted for about 40% of its total number of attendees. In a 5 year period, the percentage of 16-24-year-olds peaked at roughly 70%, while the proportion of 45-54-year-olds rose slightly to just under 50%, despite dipping to 40% in 2012. Similarly, the proportion of the elderly experienced a significant fluctuation, rising from only 10% in 2010 to 20% in 2015.
In terms of the remaining age brackets, there were about 52% of concert viewers aged 25-44%, which was double those aged 55-64 (26%) in 2010. One year later, the 25-44 age group dropped suddenly to 40% before experiencing a steady recovery to 52% in 2015. After increasing slightly one year later, the percentage of 55-to-64-year-olds decreased slightly, hitting 22%.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11330049261 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00115243947 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605911330049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.697706678 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254103018221 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111235798924 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823846035615 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175611176731 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912108117206 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.