The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The layouts illustrate the proposed changes to an office building.
It can be clearly seen that the office building will be enlarged dramatically with the two glass areas being removed to give way to new facilities with an outdoor seating area, a meeting area, a coffee machine, and a set of chairs. In addition, the renovation will happen at the front and at the back of this building.
Turing to the West of the office building, an outdoor seating area and some chairs at the front are planned, replacing the grass area. The kitchen and the canteen which is currently located at the back of the building are planned to be destroyed to make way for the two offices. However, the storeroom next to these rooms will remain unchanged.
The eastern grass area is predicted to be cut down to make room for a coffee machine, a meeting area with chairs. The WCs situated next to the storeroom will be relocated to the top-right corner of the building. At present, visitors enter the building by the right entrance. However, it is planned to remove the center. The small four rooms at the front will be renovated into two big offices.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to these rooms will remain unchanged. The eastern grass area is predicted to b...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.665 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47474746186 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6432996719 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881311113093 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412989906413 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481607466722 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807950436786 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441780148365 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.