The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given bar chart represents comparative data about the proportion of European cinema-goers in different days during 5 years, starting from 2003.
Overall, it is clear that more people prefer going to cinema on weekends than weekdays, with the highest figure belonging to Saturday over the period.
As can be observed from the graph, Monday, Tuesday and Thursday experienced a fluctuation in the number of cinema visitors; it reached its peak at under 15% in 2005, 20% in 2003 and 19% in 2007. In contrast, those who pay a visit to cinema on Friday remained the same amount of 30% after 5 years. In addition, there was a plummet in the percentage of attendance on Wednesday, which going down from 16% to 9% at the end of the period.
In terms of weekends, 40% of the European watch films at cinema on Saturday, 10% more than the percentage on Sunday in the year 2003. After escalating to the highest point at 45%, the amount of Saturday fell by 3%. Similarly, Sunday showed a fluctuating trend and ended the period at about one third of the population.
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 79
- Art classes like painting and drawing are important for children’s development and should be made compulsory in high school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 73
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...om 16% to 9% at the end of the period. In terms of weekends, 40% of the European ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, third, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69892473118 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64776076485 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3504122913 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161574047291 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675199025718 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249597224028 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914713291739 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217936129752 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.