The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to more than technology in homes in the UK.

The line graph gives information about the change in domestic access to more than technology in home of Britian from 1996 to 2003.
It is clear from the graph that, all of 4 figures experienced the increase over the period shown. Furthermore, the figure of CD player was by far highest during the research period.
In 1996/97, there were just 3 types of equipments used popularly in the UK, such as CD player, mobile phone, home computer. CD player was used the most, the figure of it took up 60 percent of people in England. The second most popular was home computer, in vicinity of 30 percent of people used it in their home. And the last one, just under 20 percent of them chose mobile phone.
In 1998/99, internet access appeared in the UK. It was used so few in households in the UK, about 10 percent of residents used it in their home. However, there was a steady increase in the amount of internet access from 1998 to 2003, but, in 2003, the figure of it was still lowest, at a bit more than 40% . The highest was still CD player, at around 80%. Lower are mobile phone and home computer, at 70% and 55% respectively

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...during the research period. In 1996/97, there were just 3 types of equipments us...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter, in vicinity of 30 percent of people used it in their home. And the last one,...
^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...was still lowest, at a bit more than 40% . The highest was still CD player, at aro...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, second, so, still, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41826923077 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33967867217 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6942910409 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5833333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189046230869 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746156606112 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970034531659 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146784178116 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132945014408 0.0819641961636 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.