The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access in modern technology in homes in the UK.
The chart illustrates how domestic access to modern technology changed in housholdings in UK.
Overall, it is apparent all the patterns were upwards, with the most big rise of owning of mobile phones and Internet. It is noticable that CD players had the highest shares both early on and at the final point of the given period.
Going into details, owning of home computers and mobile phones in 1996-1997 showed approximately 30 percent and a little less then 20 percent respectively. Then both parts rose, with more fluctuational rising for mobile phones. During 1999-2000 the percentages were almost the same for both devices, with further increase of owning mobile phones share. At the final point, proportion of using home computers lagged behind the using of mobile phones, with over 58 percent for the former and 70 percent for the latter.
With regard to Internet access, since global network appeared later, the countdown started only in 1998. This technology started out 10 percent at the beginning and finished with near 43 percent in 2003.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access in modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest 84
- The bar below illustrates how three countries deal with dangerous waste products 67
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress What do you think are the causes of this Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...roximately 30 percent and a little less then 20 percent respectively. Then both part...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08670520231 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56311293745 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.551971093 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14141709333 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670494674206 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105765065085 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12354911854 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137695422485 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.