The bar graph elucidates internet access in a European country by urban/suburban households in the year 1999 and 2004.
Overall, urban/suburban households had the highest growth rate of internet access year by year. On the other hand, rural commutes also had a slightly increased proportion of internet users in all years. In 1999, 15% of urban/suburban people were using the internet, next year it is grown by 15% more. In this addition, the year 2001, 2002, and 2003 got an upward trend of 40%, 50%, and 61% respectively. Furthermore, in the year 2004, it goes up to 65% which illustrates the urban/rural people adopt new updates and technology rapidly.
On the contrary, the rural families had a very lower share of arising in the beginning and middle years. In the year 1999, it has only 2% of people using the web, afterward, it is risen up by 2%, 5%, and 5% in the above three years. However, the steady increased comes in the year 2003 of 10% and maturing at 35% in the last year.
Therefore, the urban/suburban and rural houses both have web connections and it flows upward in all the comparative years.
- There is huge increase in the size of cities. Many cities have grown in a haphazard way why is careful planning important in the development of cities? 56
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to cooperate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinions. 84
- Students are more interested in playing games on computer rather than sports what should be done to overcome it 73
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 73
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, therefore, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78865979381 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84786700476 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561855670103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 12.7157382798 43.030603864 30% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.9 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317953642266 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139425735068 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150063966891 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239337205298 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18414619613 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.