The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
The graph shows the air pollution levels in London as micrograms per cubic metre according years.
If we look carefully, amount of smoke was almost 500 micrograms per cubic metre in between 1850 and 1900 as a the highest rate whereas it was almost zero in between 1550 and 1600 and between 1950 and 2000. In addition, amount of sulphur dioxide was almost 900 micrograms per cubic metre in around 1850s while it was nearly zero as well in between 1550 and 1600 and between 1950 and 2000.
To continue with, amount of sulphur dioxide and smoke live fluctuation sharply in 1900s. For smoke, this fluctuation started in nearly 1920 by 300 micrograms per cubic metre and it continue to 2000s. Likewise, sulphur dioxide’s fluctation give us that initially, it was 500 micrograms per cubic metre in 1900s and it became nearly zero in 2000s.
To sum up, pollution levels in London changed constantly as based on value of sulphur dioxide and smoke along year. Those started as a low level and ıt finished in low level by living up and down.
- -It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books". 61
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up.To what extent do you agree or 73
- -Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 73
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...cubic metre in between 1850 and 1900 as a the highest rate whereas it was almost zero...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as almost 900 micrograms per cubic metre in around 1850s while it was nearly zero...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1900s'.
Suggestion: in the 1900s
...xide and smoke live fluctuation sharply in 1900s. For smoke, this fluctuation started in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'continues'?
Suggestion: continues
...y 300 micrograms per cubic metre and it continue to 2000s. Likewise, sulphur dioxide&apo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1900s'.
Suggestion: in the 1900s
..., it was 500 micrograms per cubic metre in 1900s and it became nearly zero in 2000s. T...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...etre in 1900s and it became nearly zero in 2000s. To sum up, pollution levels in Lond...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 2000s. To sum up, pollution levels in London changed constantly as based on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, well, whereas, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74725274725 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43954187697 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6671346003 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238208405793 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11116933323 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104497693564 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166525018962 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113591010355 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.