The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph depicts the London’s Pollution level for 400 years. They are measured in micro grams per cubic meter.
Overall, the predominant ones for rising the unwanted dust are the Sulphur dioxide and Smoke. When compared to Smoke, Sulphur dioxide plays a vital role.
Interestingly, both Smoke and Sulphur dioxide started of their contribution with similar value. But when the years moved on the rate of trouble created by Sulphur dioxide increased dramatically. It touched the peak by the year 1850. This was not a healthy surge as they were not constantly growing. They had a lot of fluctuations from 1950 to 2000.
Smoke has also got a good share for expanding the impurity levels. It went to its maximum between 1850 and 1900. Their contribution was also Wavering after 1900. When compared to Smoke, Sulphur dioxide has kept itself in a good position. By 2000, both of them had a dramatic drop down to 0%.
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share theirwealth among poorer nations by providing such thingsas food and education? Or us it the responsibility ofthe governments of poorer nations to look after theircitizens themselves 56
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of them had a dramatic drop down to 0%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92993630573 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60452705865 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.0328663107 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 55.2857142857 112.824112599 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.2142857143 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.053244799948 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199059798737 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405177895911 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0394808666256 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042939834338 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.13 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.