The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the levels of the two pollutants namely Sulphur dioxide and smoke in London from 1600 to 2000.
It can be seen that the pollution levels of both pollutants formed a similar pattern during the period and there were always higher levels of Sulphur dioxide than smoke in the atmosphere.
In 1600, the pollution levels were modestly low, but over the next hundred years, the levels of Sulphur dioxide experienced a dramatic increase to about 700 micrograms per cubic meter, while the levels of smoke gradually grew to around 200 micrograms per cubic meter. over the next two hundred years, the levels of these two pollutants continued to rise steadily although there were some fluctuations. Between 1850 and 1900, the levels of Sulphur dioxide and smoke reached a peak of about 900 and 400 micrograms per cubic meter respectively before declining at the end of the period.
Between 1900 and 2000, air pollution became an easier problem in London than it had been in the early 20th century. these pollution figures fluctuated considerably but falling sharply to nearly 0 micrograms per cubic meter.
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 73
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the proportions of adults in Canada who own one car two cars more than two cars or who do not own a car 79
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
... around 200 micrograms per cubic meter. over the next two hundred years, the levels ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... it had been in the early 20th century. these pollution figures fluctuated considerab...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06417112299 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53528954946 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4672881568 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180712354261 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988608567397 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578430632481 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135443906269 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485376081535 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.