The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U S state of Oregon

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.

The line chart depicts the changes in the population of three different countries in the U.S state of Oregon from 1940 to 2000. Overall, the number of people in all countries increased over the period of 60 years. It also clear that Washington had the highest number of residents, while the reverse is true for Columbia.

In 1940, we can see from the chart, Washington had the highest number of people living, at 75.000. This figure then rose gradually to 120.000 in 1970. On the other hand, although standing at a lower number of 30.000 at the beginning of the period, the population of Columbia also had grown to 45.000 by 1970. Likewise, there was a slight increase in the population of Yamhill, increasing from just under to just over 30.000 of people living in 1970.

During 30 years later, it is interesting to note that, Washington's population had risen sharply to 240.000 of people at the end of the period. Washington, therefore,was still a country where had the most number of residents. Similarly, the population of both countries Columbia and Yamhill had grown steadily to 75.000 and 90.000 respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (17 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...n of three different countries in the U.S state of Oregon from 1940 to 2000. Over...
^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...ed over the period of 60 years. It also clear that Washington had the highest number ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , was
...end of the period. Washington, therefore,was still a country where had the most numb...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'likewise', 'similarly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218604651163 0.268076937826 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.116279069767 0.116061578633 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0325581395349 0.0759168565197 43% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0651162790698 0.0366838410393 178% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0139534883721 0.0131127313244 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.186046511628 0.155750635184 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0372093023256 0.0379272487307 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69864539734 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0325581395349 0.0210936926555 154% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116279069767 0.0948980150116 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0046511627907 0.00437022459523 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0046511627907 0.00967000014798 48% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1122.0 1161.00487805 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.9 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90526315789 5.90752243213 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368421052632 0.337110787985 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247368421053 0.247514529752 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173684210526 0.171178102325 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131578947368 0.112407865282 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69864539734 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.546246751206 104% => OK
Word variations: 51.3159509732 49.3433353143 104% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0094962315 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.968532416 42.9750493124 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 135.714022679 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.0094962315 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 43.7368421053 47.7609492067 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.2619047619 2.94281807926 77% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454263688469 0.418131533498 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149039697133 0.181151798455 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0728423132697 0.0850326197045 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.644399507319 0.706616315825 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13175330584 0.157042692854 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240427566305 0.228904883108 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146432659984 0.108899403657 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.53342360812 0.367819155151 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0064515311253 0.0812612215331 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367621826235 0.316326947829 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125311140335 0.0921553760075 136% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70731707317 216% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.16585365854 253% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.