The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the graph given indicates the alteration in population in the US state of Oregon's 3 counties, Yamhill, Columbia, and Washington, from 1940 to 2000.
In overall, the population of the 3 counties in Oregon grew, especially in the latter half of the surveyed period.
According to the graph, the 2 counties of Columbia and Yamhill's population growth followed a similar pattern from 1940 to 2000. Whereas in Yamhill, there were 30000 people in 1940 and then, the number rose gradually to 90000 people 60 years later, the number of people making a home in Columbia was only less by around 1000 in 1940 and 5000 in 2000.
On the contrast, the county of Washington obviously attracted more people with 75000 residents at the starting point of the surveyed period. Throughout the first half of 30 years, more people steadily resided in Washington county, which made the number go up to over 120000 in 1970. Ultimately, the number shot up dramatically and peaked at over 240000 people at the end of the 60-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | xa1en | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | sfrtr4 | view | |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 67
- The charts show what Uk graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after college in 2008. 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopement 73
- The tables compare working hours of full time and part time workers in Greece Netherlands and the UK compared to European average in 2002 82
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85795454545 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61683968717 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8910841778 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149660057403 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810269619469 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709952711242 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112181566145 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625896076919 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.